On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:51 -0700
> > "Miles Lane" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-00:1023
> >> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-02:1023 -> 0-01:1023
> >> ieee1394: Node suspended: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0080880002103eae]
> >>
> >> =============================================
> >> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> >> 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 #2
> >> ---------------------------------------------
> >> knodemgrd_0/2321 is trying to acquire lock:
> >> (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [<f8958897>] nodemgr_probe_ne+0x311/0x38d [ieee1394]
> >>
> >> but task is already holding lock:
> >> (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [<f8959078>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x717/0x883 [ieee1394]
> [...]
>
> This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the
> ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they?
they should be yes
(but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined
into)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
