Hello,
,----[ Documentation/hrtimers.txt]--
| We used the high-resolution clock subsystem ontop of hrtimers to
| verify the hrtimer implementation details in praxis
`----
I didn't find any "high-resolution clock subsystem" in the internet as
patch. Can you give me the point or did I got this sentence wrong?
Thanks.
BTW: There's a typo in this text, patch below. And I hope the patch is
correct. Or would an extra email for this be better?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed typo in hrtimers documentation.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <[email protected]>
---
hrtimers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- Documentation/hrtimers.txt.orig 2006-09-05 16:53:51.000000000 +0200
+++ Documentation/hrtimers.txt 2006-09-05 16:54:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
----------------------------------
We used the high-resolution clock subsystem ontop of hrtimers to verify
-the hrtimer implementation details in praxis, and we also ran the posix
+the hrtimer implementation details in practise, and we also ran the posix
timer tests in order to ensure specification compliance. We also ran
tests on low-resolution clocks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
