(trimming CC list)
Paul Mackerras <[email protected]> ha scritto:
Alon Bar-Lev writes:
>
>> Current implementation stores a static command-line
>> buffer allocated to COMMAND_LINE_SIZE size. Most
>> architectures stores two copies of this buffer, one
>> for future reference and one for parameter parsing.
>
> Under what circumstances do we actually need a command line of more
> than 256 bytes?
>
> It seems to me that if 256 bytes isn't enough, we should take a deep
> breath, step back, and think about whether there might be a better way
> to pass whatever information it is that's using up so much of the
> command line.
Well, if you want to set a parameter of a builtin module you have to
use:
modulename.parameter=whatever
which can use a lot of space... I suppose that with an "everything
builtin" kernel and a few modules to tune you can get near the limit.
Luca
--
Home: http://kronoz.cjb.net
Il tempo speso
a coltivare sogni
non �precato.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
