Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line

On 9/4/06, Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> wrote:

The reason is our initial address space layout for the very first kernel
images. Now it is hard to changed because the different ipl tools rely
on the layout. We choose to add a few more bytes than 256 because on
s390 we potentially have many devices. The dasd= parameter can really be
big.

Thanks for the explanation... I've been curios as well :)
Can you please check if this patch is OK in s390 environment?

Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.

--
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
    • From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
    • From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Linux 2.6.18-rc6
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc5 with GRE, iptables and Speedtouch ADSL, PPP over ATM
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]