Re: Raid 0 Swap?

[Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>]

Marc Perkel wrote:
> If I have two drives and I want swap to be fast if I allocate swap spam
> on both drives does it break up the load between them? Or would it run
> faster if I did a Raid 0 swap?

Don't do that - swap on raid0.  Don't do that.  Unless you don't care
about your data, ofcourse.  Seriously.

If something with swap space goes wrong, God only knows what will break.
It is trivial to break userspace data this way, when an app is swapped
out and there's an error reading it from swap, its data file very likely
to be corrupt, especially when it is interrupted during file update.
It is probably possible to corrupt the whole filesystem this way too,
when some kernel memory has been swapped out and is needed to write some
parts of filesystem, but it can't be read back.

Ie, your swap space must be reliable.  At least not worse than your memory.
And with striping, you've much more chances of disk failure...

Yes it sounds very promising at first, to let kernel stripe swap space,
for faster operations.  But hell, first, try to avoid swappnig in the
first place, by installing appropriate amount memory which is cheap
nowadays, so there will be just no need for swapping.  And when it's
done, it's not relevant anymore whenever your swap space is fast or
not.  But make it *reliable*.

/mjt

-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.49924
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/