Re: in-kernel rpc.statd

In article <[email protected]> you wrote:
> Hm. I do not have a rpc.statd userspace program nor kernel daemon (running 
> on 2.6.17-vanilla). Yet everything is working. Is there a specific need for 
> statd?

It is more or less an uptime notification protocol for NFS locks. I think
NFS clients can recover from a reboot without the help of the statd in most
situations.

Gruss
Bernd

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0.429236
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: in-kernel rpc.statd
  - From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: in-kernel rpc.statd
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line
Next by Date: One of my messages was incorrectly tagged as spam. Can we fix the filter?
Previous by thread: Re: in-kernel rpc.statd
Next by thread: Re: in-kernel rpc.statd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]