[PATCH] Documentation/ABI: devfs is not obsolete, but removed!

["jens m. noedler" <noedler@web.de>]

Hi everybody, Greg, Linus,

This little patch just moves the devfs entry from ABI/obsolete to
ABI/removed and adds the comment, that devfs was removed in 2.6.18.

The patch is against linus' current git tree and should go into the final
2.6.18.

Kind regards, Jens


Signed-off-by: jens m. noedler <noedler@web.de>

---

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/devfs b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/devfs
deleted file mode 100644
index b8b8739..0000000
--- a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/devfs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-What:		devfs
-Date:		July 2005
-Contact:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-Description:
-	devfs has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable
-	races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is
-	against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
-	The files fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h will be removed,
-	along with the the assorted devfs function calls throughout the
-	kernel tree.
-
-Users:
-
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs b/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e360fa9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/removed/devfs
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+What:		devfs
+Date:		July 2005 (scheduled), finally removed in kernel v2.6.18
+Contact:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
+Description:
+	devfs has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable
+	races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is
+	against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
+	The files fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h will be removed,
+	along with the the assorted devfs function calls throughout the
+	kernel tree.
+
+Users:



-- 
jens m. noedler
  noedler@web.de
  pgp: 0x9f0920bb
  http://noedler.de





-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.740655
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/