On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:44:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 13:04 +0200, Frank v Waveren wrote: > > Here's a different patch, which should actually sleep for the > > specified amount of time up to 2^64 seconds with a loop around the > > sleeps and a tally of how long is left to sleep. It does mean we wake > > up once every 300 years on long sleeps, but that shouldn't cause any > > huge performance problems. > > Which non academic problem is solved by this patch ? Compared to a current linus kernel, it fixes the overflow problem. Compared to the current mm (good job on finding the sneaky bug in that one by the way) it doesn't fix anything additional, but still fixes all of the same things plus the academic problems. And it makes the GNU coreutils people happy, which is rarely a bad thing. -- Frank v Waveren Key fingerprint: BDD7 D61E [email protected] 5D39 CF05 4BFC F57A Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/468D62C8 FA00 7D51 468D 62C8
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Frank v Waveren <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- Prev by Date: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
- Next by Date: [RFC/PATCH-mm] i8042: activate panic blink only in X
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
- Next by thread: [PATCH] NOMMU: Check that access_process_vm() has a valid target
- Index(es):