Re: megaraid_sas suspend ok, resume oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:47:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

 > > Precluding NX support + swsusp kinda sucks, but I guess it's a tiny subset of users.
 > 
 > Well, I think the majority of NX-capable CPUs are also x86_64, in which case
 > I'd recommend using a 64-bit kernel anyway.

There's a fairly large number of these "Core Duo" systems out there :)
Hopefully these are the last CPUs lacking longmode that Intel will make.
Asides from these, the only other 32-bit only CPUs with NX are the newer VIA C3s.

For the Fedora users it's not that big a deal not being able to take advantage
of NX, as we fall back to using the old segment limit tricks that exec-shield
does to emulate NX, without having to worry about PAE headaches.

Given the only other use of PAE is >4GB support, and these systems typically
max out at 4GB due to the limited number of memory slots, it's not really that
big a problem.

 > I was afraid the issue would be urgent, but it doesn't seem so now.  I'd like to
 > postpone fixing it until we can create suspend images larger that 350 meg on
 > i386 boxes with highmem (the patch is ready to go to -mm after 2.6.19-rc1 as
 > 2.6.20 material).

Sounds good to me.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0.178966
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux