On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 05:04:09PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> One more comment: The second parameter of error_detected also could be deleted
> because recovery procedures will save error to pci_dev->error_state.
Yes, I beleive so.
> So, the err_handler pci_error_handlers could be:
> struct pci_error_handlers
> {
> pci_ers_result_t (*error_detected)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> pci_ers_result_t (*error_resume)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> };
No, as per other email, we still need a multi-step process for
multi-function cards, and for cards that may not want to get
a full electrical reset. Finally, there might be platforms
that cannot perform a per-slot electrical reset, and would
therefore require drivers that can recover on thier own.
--linas
--
VGER BF report: H 8.89398e-05
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]