Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

Andi Kleen wrote:

I applied it now, with one change. I replaced the %Ps with %cs because
that is apparently the more official way to do that in gcc. Please
change that in your copy too.

Do you mean the %P0, etc in the asms?

There unfortunately were still quite a lot of rejects because -mm* is too different from mainline, but I fixed them all.

Thanks.  Were there more conflicts than entry.S?

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Type checking for write_pda()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]