Re: [PATCH] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] in 2.6.18-rc5

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:43:19AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> spin_unlock_irqrestore() goes through lockdep
> but spin_lock_irqrestore() doesn't.

but spin_lock_irqsave() doesn't!

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] in 2.6.18-rc5
    • From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 6/8] Update sys_vm86 to cope with changed pt_regs and %gs usage.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] stex: adjust command timeout in slave_config routine
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] in 2.6.18-rc5
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] in 2.6.18-rc5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]