Re: kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293!

David Chinner wrote:

But that might be a good place to start. Can you see if you can
reproduce the problem without this config option set?

No, I can't reproduce this prlblem without the CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
config option set, the fsstress testcase works fine.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293!
    • From: Yao Fei Zhu <[email protected]>
  • Re: kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293!
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
  • Re: kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293!
    • From: Yao Fei Zhu <[email protected]>
  • Re: kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293!
    • From: David Chinner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 004 of 19] knfsd: lockd: introduce nsm_handle
• Next by Date: [PATCH] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] in 2.6.18-rc5
• Previous by thread: Re: kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293!
• Next by thread: PROBLEM:
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]