Le jeudi 31 août 2006 à 16:39 -0400, Lee Revell a écrit :
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:30 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 08:23, Greg KH wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Thomas and I lamented that we were getting tired of seeing stuff like
> > > this, and it was about time that we added the proper code to the kernel
> > > to provide everything that would be needed in order to write PCI drivers
> > > in userspace in a sane manner. Really all that is needed is a way to
> > > handle the interrupt, everything else can already be done in userspace
> > > (look at X for an example of this...)
> > [...]
> > > So, here's the code.
> >
> > I know I look like I'm trolling here, but as this is the perfect
> > stable-binary-driver-ABI some people have been looking for, it would be
> > wise to make it taint the kernel with its own flag.
>
> Why? There's no technical or legal requirement for userspace drivers to
> be GPLed.
Precisely. How do you know the bugreport you received isn't caused by
some weird binary userspace driver hosing the PCI bus ?
Xav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]