Re: - i386-early-fault-handler.patch removed from -mm tree

Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes:

> * Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > This patch was dropped because a different version got merged by andi
> > 
> > <*sigh*>
> > 
> > Didn't anyone even notice the fix that was already in -mm?  Now we're 
> > back to "guess which fault it was" when an early fault occurs.
> 
> just revert Andi's and apply your patch, and send the resulting combo 
> patch to Andrew.

Ok I can drop my patch if there is a better one.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: - i386-early-fault-handler.patch removed from -mm tree
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: - i386-early-fault-handler.patch removed from -mm tree
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] fix long long cast in pte macro
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Have x86_64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes
• Previous by thread: Re: - i386-early-fault-handler.patch removed from -mm tree
• Next by thread: RE: one more ACPI Error (utglobal-0125): Unknown exception code:0xFFFFFFEA [Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm3]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]