On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:48:22 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Plus: I'd want to see a maintainance person or team who
> respond promptly to email and who remain reasonably engaged with what's
> going on in the mainline kernel. Because if problems crop up (and they
> will), I don't want to have to be the bunny who has to worry about them...
umm, clarification needed here.
No criticism of the present maintainers intended! Last time I grabbed the
kgdb patches from sf.net they applied nicely, worked quite reliably (much
better than the old ones I'd been trying to sustain) and had been
tremendously cleaned up.
But if we're to move this work from sf.net to kernel.org, the kgdb
maintainers' workload, email load, turnaround time requirements,
bug-difficulty and everything else will go up quite a lot, at least short-term.
If they don't want to volunteer take that on (perfectly legit and sane) then
things should stay as they are.
(otoh, a merge would decrease their patch-maintenance load, and would
increase the number of people who fix things for them, and might attract new
maintainers).
It's a big step.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
