Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot

Ar Mer, 2006-08-30 am 22:03 +0200, ysgrifennodd Willy Tarreau:
> So, to conclude, with or without the bug, "hlt;jmp $" will halt the
> CPU as we expect it to. Therefore, I'd like you to restore it in
> the patch.

Having had a dig I would concur that we should add the "hlt" back. The
cases I can find are 386/486 "hangs if hlt executed" bugs, mostly
unresolved/chipset problems and a "hlt during IDE DMA hangs the box" bug
we work around on the Cyrix CS5510.

That said for a PIV at least "hlt" really makes little difference to the
power burn

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
    • From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
    • From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
    • From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 19/19] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #6]
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] eCryptfs: ino_t to u64 for filldir
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFC] exception processing in early boot
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]