Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 30 August 2006 19:13, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I tried that once on x86-64, but it wasn't possible because the linker
> > is missing the right relocations. It has something on the first look similar 
> > for __thread data in user space, but it wasn't usable for the kernel.
> >   
> The other difficulty is that you can't take the addresses of things in 
> the pda and pass them around, which happens a lot.  

The user space __thread works around this by always storing the address at
offset 0. Kernel does it similar, except it's not at offset 0.


> (Hm, it would be interesting to see if we could possibly use the code 
> generated by gcc for TLS variables...)

I tried once on 64bit and it wasn't possible for various reasons.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux