Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/08/06, Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30/08/06, Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 01:30 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On 29/08/06, Nathan Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > On 28/08/06, Kasper Sandberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 12:10 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > > > Not really a regression, more like a long standing bug, but XFS has
> > > > > > issues in 2.6.18-rc* (and earlier kernels, at least post 2.6.11).
> > > > > and you are saying this issue exists in all post .11 kernels?
> > >
> > > I would be surprised if this is not a day one bug, it probably
> > > even affects the IRIX version of XFS.  Our problem is the lack
> > > of a test case to find it - my efforts have come to naught so
> > > far.  I'm having to cross my fingers that Jesper can extract a
> > > bit more information when he's next able to hit it.
> > >
> > I'm trying my best, but it's difficult. Often I can only run the -rc
> > kernel for a few hours on the box that currently shows the problem,
> > and that's not enough to hit the fault.
> > I've configured a XFS partition on my home workstation and I'm keeping
> > that one busy doing various rsync's and running benchmarks etc -
> > putting as much different stress on the XFS filesystem as I can. I'm
> > also setting up a test box at work to try and duplicate the problem on
> > a non-production server. I won't be able to duplicate the setup
> > exactly, but it'll be close.
>
> i have nyself tested xfs in -rc5 now, doing rsync over and over, and
> been unable to hit any problem, it indeed seems very hard to reproduce.
>
Just in case I have not mentioned it before; the box I'm seeing the
problem on is a dual 3.2GHz Xeon and the kernel is compiled for SMP.
might be relevant, might not be...

Small correction: The CPU is a single 3.2GHz Xeon with HT. Not two
physical cores.
I should probably also mention that the 2.6.11.11 kernel that runs
stable on the server is compiled for UP, not SMP.

--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux