> Unfortunately, this situation is even more difficult for me, because it's
> getting very hard to track patches that get applied, rejected, modified or
> obsoleted, which is even more true when people don't always think about
> sending an ACK after the patch finally gets in. I already have a few pending
> patches in my queue waiting for an ACK that will have to be tracked if the
> persons do not respond, say, within one week. Otherwise I might simply lose
> them.
It shouldn't be that hard to check gitweb or git output occasionally
for the patches. You can probably even automate that.
> I think that the good method would be to :
> - announce the patch
> - find a volunteer to port it
> - apply it once the volunteer agrees to handle it
> This way, no code gets lost because there's always someone to track it.
I can put that one into my tree for .19
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
