[PATCH 0/6] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, try #3

This should address all comments I got for the second version.
Since there is no common agreement on what should happen to
the _syscallX macros, I'm not touching them at all this time.

Whoever wants to remove, reenable or replace them, should send
a separate set of patches for these. With my patches, these
macros are not used in the kernel, and not useable from user
space, so we should probably do _something_ about them.

	Arnd <><

--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__, try #3
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 6/6] remove remaining errno and __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ references
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/6] rename the provided execve functions to kernel_execve
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 5/6] sh64: remove the use of kernel syscalls
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 4/6] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/6] introduce kernel_execve
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/6] provide kernel_execve on all architectures
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/6] introduce kernel_execve
Next by Date: [PATCH 4/6] Remove the use of _syscallX macros in UML
Previous by thread: [S390] dasd default debug level.
Next by thread: [PATCH 3/6] provide kernel_execve on all architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]