Re: Spinlock query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rajat Jain wrote:
On 8/30/06, Rik van Riel <[email protected]> wrote:
Rick Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my driver (Process context), I have written the following code:
>
> --------------------------------------------
> spin_lock(lock)
> ...
> //Critical section to manipulate driver data

... interrupt hits here
    interrupt handler tries to grab the spinlock, which is already taken
    *BOOM*

> spin_u lock(lock)
> ---------------------------------------------
>

The interrupt handler TRIES to grab the spinlock, which is already
taken. Why will it "BOOM"? Wouldn't the interrupt handler busy wait,
waiting for the lock?

Am I missing something here?

Yes, it will busy wait.  Forever.


--
What is important?  What you want to be true, or what is true?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux