Re: [PATCH 00/19] BLOCK: Permit block layer to be disabled [try #5]

Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any remaining changes? Looks fine to me, although I wonder why you did
> not kill the block_sync_page() completely in AFS. Christophs analysis
> looked correct to me.

Try #6 which I've just posted should do the trick.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH 00/19] BLOCK: Permit block layer to be disabled [try #5]
  - From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/19] BLOCK: Permit block layer to be disabled [try #5]
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NOMMU: Set BDI capabilities for /dev/mem and /dev/kmem
Next by Date: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/19] BLOCK: Permit block layer to be disabled [try #5]
Next by thread: [PATCH] endianness fixes for 16T ext patches
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]