Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:56:54 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

> While I'm sure it's an interesting intellectual exercise to do these
> advanced rwsems it would be better for everybody else to go for a single 
> maintainable C implementation.

metoo.  It's irritating having multiple implementations around, never being
sure which version people are running with.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux