Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:25:02PM +0100, David Howells wrote:

> Some of these have LL/SC or equivalent instead, but ARM5 and before, FRV, M68K
> before 68020 to name but a few.

68k before 68020 isn't supported by Linux anyway.

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: "Dong Feng" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 07/19] BLOCK: Remove dependence on existence of blockdev_superblock [try #5]
• Next by Date: [PATCH 05/19] BLOCK: Don't call block_sync_page() from AFS [try #5]
• Previous by thread: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
• Next by thread: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]