On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:25:02PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Some of these have LL/SC or equivalent instead, but ARM5 and before, FRV, M68K > before 68020 to name but a few. 68k before 68020 isn't supported by Linux anyway. Ralf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- References:
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: "Dong Feng" <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 07/19] BLOCK: Remove dependence on existence of blockdev_superblock [try #5]
- Next by Date: [PATCH 05/19] BLOCK: Don't call block_sync_page() from AFS [try #5]
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
- Index(es):
 |