Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Dong Feng wrote:

> Or perhaps this offset is just some personal favor. Say if the first
> kernel designer decided to locate kernel at 2-3G linear address, then
> 2G offset would have appeared in code. Is this the case?

Well this is the second time that you suggest that the reason for 
technical decisions have to do with personal favors. Are you trying to 
provoke us into answering your question?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
    • From: "Dong Feng" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
    • From: "Dong Feng" <[email protected]>
  • Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
    • From: "Dong Feng" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Change return values from queue_work et al.
• Next by Date: observations on configfs
• Previous by thread: Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
• Next by thread: Re: The 3G (or nG) Kernel Memory Space Offset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]