Re: [PATCH 000 of 2] Invalidate_inode_pages2 changes.

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:30:15 +1000
NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I'm picking up on a conversation that was started in late March
>  this year, and which didn't get anywhere much.
>  See
>    http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/31/93
>  and following.

Nick's "possible lock_page fix for Andrea's nopage vs invalidate race?"
patch (linux-mm) should fix this?

If filemap_nopage() does lock_page(), invalidate_inode_pages2_range() is solid?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 000 of 2] Invalidate_inode_pages2 changes.
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 000 of 2] Invalidate_inode_pages2 changes.
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc5
• Next by Date: Re: HPA Resume patch
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 002 of 2] Make data destruction in invalidate_inode_pages2 optional.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 000 of 2] Invalidate_inode_pages2 changes.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]