>> Just would like to ask if you want patches for:
>
>Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy. I very much hope you didn't
>get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged.
>
>> * (Most importent, may introduce bugs if left alone)
>> Fixing boolean checking, ex:
>> if (bool == FALSE)
>> to
>> if (!bool)
>
>this one of course makes sense, but please do it without introducing
>any boolean type. Getting rid of all the TRUE/FALSE defines and converting
>all scsi drivers to classic C integer as boolean semantics would be
>very welcome janitorial work.
I don't get it. You object to the 'idiocy'
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/27/281), but find the x==FALSE -> !x
a good thing?
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
