Re: Conversion to generic boolean

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/08/06, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:24:42AM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Hello
>
> Just would like to ask if you want patches for:

Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy.  I very much hope you didn't
get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged.

>
> * (Most importent, may introduce bugs if left alone)
> Fixing boolean checking, ex:
> if (bool == FALSE)
> to
> if (!bool)

this one of course makes sense, but please do it without introducing
any boolean type.  Getting rid of all the TRUE/FALSE defines and converting
all scsi drivers to classic C integer as boolean semantics would be
very welcome janitorial work.

If you'll take such patches I'd be willing to clean up a few drivers..
Any specific ones you'd like me to start with?

--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux