Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386.

[Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>]

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:34:46AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andreas Mohr wrote:
> >This is interesting, since even by doing a non-elegant
> >current->... --> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> >replacement for excessive uses of current, I was able to gain almost 10kB
> >within a single file already!
> >I guess it's due to having tried that on an older installation with gcc 
> >3.2,
> >which probably does less efficient opcode merging of current_thread_info()
> >requests compared to a current gcc version.
> >IOW, .text segment reduction could be quite a bit higher for older gcc:s.
> >  
> 
> That doesn't sound likely.  current_thread_info() is only about 2 
> instructions.  Are you looking at the .text segment size, or the actual 
> file size?  The latter can be very misleading in the presence of debug info.

Got me. File size only. And that was 10kB of around 170kB, BTW.

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/