[PATCH] oom_kill_task: cleanup ->mm checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



- It is not possible to have task->mm == &init_mm.

- task_lock() buys nothing for 'if (!p->mm)' check.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

--- 2.6.18-rc4/mm/oom_kill.c~	2006-08-27 22:28:42.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/mm/oom_kill.c	2006-08-27 23:09:09.000000000 +0400
@@ -262,14 +262,11 @@ static void __oom_kill_task(struct task_
 		return;
 	}
 
-	task_lock(p);
-	if (!p->mm || p->mm == &init_mm) {
+	if (!p->mm) {
 		WARN_ON(1);
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "tried to kill an mm-less task!\n");
-		task_unlock(p);
 		return;
 	}
-	task_unlock(p);
 
 	if (message) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Killed process %d (%s).\n",
@@ -303,7 +300,7 @@ static int oom_kill_task(struct task_str
 	 * However, this is of no concern to us.
 	 */
 
-	if (mm == NULL || mm == &init_mm)
+	if (mm == NULL)
 		return 1;
 
 	__oom_kill_task(p, message);

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux