We don't need to disable irqs to clear current->io_context, it is protected
by ->alloc_lock. Even IF it was possible to submit I/O from IRQ on behalf of
current this irq_disable() can't help: current_io_context() will re-instantiate
->io_context after irq_enable().
We don't need task_lock() or local_irq_disable() to clear ioc->task. This can't
prevent other CPUs from playing with our io_context anyway.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
--- 2.6.18-rc4/block/ll_rw_blk.c~6_exit 2006-08-27 00:10:53.000000000 +0400
+++ 2.6.18-rc4/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2006-08-27 00:11:47.000000000 +0400
@@ -3580,25 +3580,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_io_context);
/* Called by the exitting task */
void exit_io_context(void)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct io_context *ioc;
struct cfq_io_context *cic;
- local_irq_save(flags);
task_lock(current);
ioc = current->io_context;
current->io_context = NULL;
- ioc->task = NULL;
task_unlock(current);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ ioc->task = NULL;
if (ioc->aic && ioc->aic->exit)
ioc->aic->exit(ioc->aic);
if (ioc->cic_root.rb_node != NULL) {
cic = rb_entry(rb_first(&ioc->cic_root), struct cfq_io_context, rb_node);
cic->exit(ioc);
}
-
+
put_io_context(ioc);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
