On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:51:17PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Michael Halcrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> > filldir()'s inode number is now type u64 instead of ino_t.
>
> Btw, in ecryptfs_interpose(), you have:
>
> inode = iget(sb, lower_inode->i_ino);
>
> But you have to be *very* *very* careful doing that. i_ino may be
> ambiguous. My suggestions to make i_ino bigger were turned down by
> Al Viro; and even it were bigger, it might still not be unique.
Is this the case as long as we stay under the same mountpoint?
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
