Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)

> D) Virtual scan of mm's in the over-limit container
> 
> E) Modify existing physical scanner to be able to skip pages which
>    belong to not-over-limit containers.

The same applies to dentries/inodes too, doesn't it? But their
scan is already virtual so their LRUs could be just split into
a per container list (but then didn't Christoph L. plan to 
rewrite that code anyways?)

For memory my guess would be that (E) would be easier than (D) for user/file
memory though less efficient.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: new i386 files
• Next by Date: [PATCH 03/18] [PATCH] BLOCK: Stop fallback_migrate_page() from using page_has_buffers() [try #3]
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]