On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:37:23AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 23:33 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If a "build everything except for assembler files at once" approach is
> > possible, it should be possible to revert this and get even further
> > savings.
>
> Only if we build _everything_ at once, which may take an insane amount
> of RAM. Doing it a directory at a time makes a certain amount of sense,
> and tends to combine the most incestuous code -- although maybe
> combinations like building arch/$ARCH/kernel/ with kernel/ (and likewise
> mm) could be an interesting experiment.
My hope is "insane" would be something like "1 GB of RAM" that is no
longer insane on current computers. [1]
> I suspected that most of the 'further savings' to which you refer above
> could be achieved more easily with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
> --gc-sections
AFAIR -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections cause some overhead in the
resulting binary?
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
[1] The interesting cases are embedded systems needing a small kernel
that gets built on a much bigger system.
Whether this should be the default compile mode for everyone is a
different issue.
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
