Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote: > No. I find that mixture of < and <= is much less easy to read. Besides, > the compiler should be able to optimise that for me. So you don't think they're mathematically equivalent? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] ext3 inode numbers are unsigned long
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode
- Index(es):
 |