> At the moment hardirq+softirq is just added to a random process, in
> general this is completely wrong.
It's better than not accounting it at all.
> You just need a system with a cpu hog
> and an i/o bound process and you get queer results.
Yes, but system load that is invisible to standard monitoring
tools is even worse.
If you stop accounting it to random processes you have to
account it somewhere else. Preferably somewhere that standard tools
automatically pick up.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
