Re: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()

Edward Falk <[email protected]> writes:

> Add spin_lock_string_flags and _raw_spin_lock_flags() to
> asm-x86_64/spinlock.h so that _spin_lock_irqsave() has the same
> semantics on x86_64 as it does on i386 and does *not* have interrupts
> disabled while it is waiting for the lock.

Did it fix anything for you?

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()
  - From: Suleiman Souhlal <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()
  - From: Edward Falk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [libata patch] cleanup drivers/ata/Kconfig
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]