On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:06:01 -0700
Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> wrote:
> +#define PFM_LAST_CPU(ctx, act) \
> + ((ctx)->last_cpu == smp_processor_id() && (ctx)->last_act == act)
Hiding this in a macro rather invites mistakes. Has all this code been
thoroughly tested with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, to detect use of
smp_processor_id() in preemptible code?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
