On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:55:26PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:54:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Why?
>
> Because it inlines when it needs to, and does not generate
> out of line code when its address is taken.
Ah, I start to remember.
Is this actually used anywhere in the kernel?
> > Can someone tell me which of the Alpha "static inline"'s need for some
> > reason an __always_inline?
>
> There shouldn't be any.
>
> > Does the never defined __IO_EXTERN_INLINE still have any purpose?
>
> It is defined.
>
> $ grep 'define __IO_EXTERN_INLINE' * | wc -l
> 12
Ups, I was blind...
> r~
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
