Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 13:03, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS
+extern struct hlist_head bc_hash[];
+extern spinlock_t bc_hash_lock;
I wonder who pokes into that hash from other files? Looks a bit dangerous.
it was kernel/ub/proc.c with proc interface :)
however, we removed it from this patchset version, but forgot extern's...
will remove
+void __put_beancounter(struct beancounter *bc);
+static inline void put_beancounter(struct beancounter *bc)
+{
+ __put_beancounter(bc);
+}
The wrapper seems pointless too.
yep, almost the same reason :)
The file could use a overview comment what the various counter
types actually are.
you mean comment about what resource parameters we introduce?
ok, will add it with each resource patch.
+ bc_print_id(bc, uid, sizeof(uid));
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "BC %s %s warning: %s "
Doesn't this need some rate limiting? Or can it be only triggered
by code bugs?
only due to code bugs.
+ bc = &default_beancounter;
+ memset(bc, 0, sizeof(default_beancounter));
You don't trust the BSS to be zero? @)
:))
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]