On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:51:38 -0700
Josh Triplett <[email protected]> wrote:
> The lock annotations used on spinlocks and rwlocks currently use
> __{acquires,releases}(spinlock_t) and __{acquires,releases}(rwlock_t),
> respectively. This loses the information of which lock actually got acquired
> or released, and assumes a different type for the parameter of __acquires and
> __releases than the rest of the kernel. While the current implementations of
> __acquires and __releases throw away their argument, this will not always
> remain the case.
It won't? Why, what will happen?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
