On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:46:34 -0700 Clay Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps I mis-recall, but shouldn't delayed writes (or something along > those lines) cause a case where two files are being incrementally > written rare? If we did delayed allocation, yes. But we generally don't. (Exceptions: XFS, reiser4, ext4, ext2 prototype circa 2001). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- From: Clay Barnes <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- Next by Date: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: eliminate minimum window size for bitmap searching
- Index(es):
 |