On Tuesday 22 August 2006 16:58, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > This says to me that (as long as the MCFG table has an End Bus Number of
> > > 31) a 32 MB decode area (32 MB aligned, too) is valid.
> > >
> > > Would something like the below patch be accepted? It makes my system
> > > work...
> >
> > I already got a patch to remove the complete e820 validation code because
> > it broke far more than it fixed. That should fix your problem too.
>
> Great! Coming in 2.6.18?
Yes.
>
> > > Also, why are we forcing 32 bit base addresses? ACPI defines it to be a
> > > 64 bit base...
> >
> > Where do you think we do that?
>
> Looking at 2.6.17, we always have u32 base_address and u32
> base_reserved. base_address is the only one ever referenced, that I can
> see. I guess I should grab 2.6.18 pre-releases and recheck.
True. Please submit a patch.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
