Re: ipt_MARK/xt_MARK usage problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>How do I get MARK back to work in -t filter -- possibly without hacking in 
>>>>xt_MARK.c?
>>>
>>>You won't, its not supposed to work in the filter table.
>> 
>> This worked in 2.6.16, where the ipt_mark_reg_v1 strucutre in xt_MARK.c did 
>> not have a .table limiter. (It also worked in practice, i.e. packets got 
>> marked like they should.) I do not see why this was changed.
>
>That is not true, all versions of the mark target starting in 2.4 had
>the same check in the checkentry function.

Oh sorry I mixed something up. It is CONNMARK which did work (and continues 
to do so) in -t filter... everything fine, sorry for the noise.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux