printk()s of user-supplied strings (Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again)

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:36:01PM -0400, Ernie Petrides wrote:
> -			printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to load interpreter %.128s\n",
> -				elf_interpreter);

I'd rather have this message rate-limited, not dropped completely.

Another long-time concern that I had is that we've got some printk()s
of user-supplied string data.  What about embedded linefeeds - can this
be used to produce fake kernel messages with arbitrary log level (syslog
priority)?  It certainly seems so.

Also, there are terminal controls...

Alexander
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: printk()s of user-supplied strings (Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again)
  - From: Ernie Petrides <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again
  - From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again
  - From: Ernie Petrides <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] IP1000A: IC Plus update
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] file posix capabilities
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again
Next by thread: Re: printk()s of user-supplied strings (Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf.c : the BAD_ADDR macro again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]