Andi Kleen <[email protected]> writes:
>> I'm not certain I caught everything but as far as I know I did.
>> Part of that was by having the code run at a fixed virtual address so
>> we still live in the last 2GB of the virtual address space.
>
> You changed the -2GB (or rather -40MB unpatched) mapping to not necessarily
> be linear?
I left it linear but I removed assumptions about which physical address it
goes to.
> There are a couple of assumptions that it is, including at boot up
> (it doubles as the 1:1 mapping then) and in change_page_attr() and in
> suspend/resume.
Yes. Those all sound familiar.
I removed the doubling as the 1:1 physical mapping.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
