Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:33:08PM +0000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Looks ok to me.  Everything except sync && cpu == this_cpu checks.

Hmm ..yes ..stupid of me. !sync will catch the case I had in mind.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] [DOCBOOK] fix segfault in docproc.c
Next by Date: [patch 02/20] sky2: phy power problem on 88e805x
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
Next by thread: question on pthreads
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]