Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:33:08PM +0000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Looks ok to me.  Everything except sync && cpu == this_cpu checks.

Hmm ..yes ..stupid of me. !sync will catch the case I had in mind.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] [DOCBOOK] fix segfault in docproc.c
• Next by Date: [patch 02/20] sky2: phy power problem on 88e805x
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
• Next by thread: question on pthreads
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]