Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Gwe, 2006-08-18 am 12:32 -0700, ysgrifennodd Dave Hansen:

It ought to be cheap. Given each set of page structs is an array its a
simple subtract and divide (or with care and people try to pack them
nicely for cache lines - shift) to get to the parallel accounting array.

I wish page structs were just a simple array. ;)


Note I very carefully said "each set of"


It will just be a bit more code, but we'll need this for the two other
memory models: sparsemem and discontigmem.  For discontig, we'll just
need pointers in the pg_data_ts and, for sparsemem, we'll likely need
another pointer in the 'struct mem_section'.


Actually I don't believe this is true in either case. Change the code
which allocates the page arrays to allocate (+ sizeof(void *) *
pages_in_array on the end of each array when using UBC. The rest then
seems to come out naturally.
I only doubt what gain we will have in this situation.
boot-time selectable vs. CONFIG-selectable?

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux