Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:16:29PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> I dislike this change.

Which one?  The introduction of CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT or having it and
CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT disabled by default - or both?

> We had this discussion before, didnt we?

Yes, you had proposed the same thing that Willy did - to introduce
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT but have it default to enabled, and to not
change any other defaults.  I simply haven't had the time (nor
motivation since this almost defeats the purpose of the patch) to
re-arrange the patch for that yet, so I decided to post what I readily
had first for public comment.  I should have mentioned this past
discussion in my posting, sorry.

Thanks,

Alexander
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT
  - From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT
  - From: Solar Designer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT
  - From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
Next by Date: Re: Fw: Regression with hyper threading scheduling
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]